A simple proof of the Mattila-Sjolin theorem

The Mattila-Sjolin theorem says that if the Hausdorff dimension of E \subset {[0,1]}^d is greater than \frac{d+1}{2}, the the distance set \Delta(E)=\{|x-y|: x,y \in E \} contains an interval. Mihalis Mourgoglou, Krystal Taylor and recently extended this result to distance sets \Delta_B(E)=\{ {||x-y||}_B: x,y \in E \}, where {|| \cdot ||}_B is the distance generated by a symmetric convex body B with a smooth boundary and everywhere non-vanishing Gaussian curvature. We also prove other things, but my goal here is to describe our proof of the Mattila-Sjolin result extended to smooth well-curved metrics.

Define the measure \nu on \Delta_B(E) by the relation

\int f(t) d\nu(t)=\int \int f({||x-y||}_B) d\mu(x) d\mu(y), where d\mu is a Frostman measure on E. We prove that

\frac{\mu((t-\epsilon, t+\epsilon))}{\epsilon}=M(t)+R^{\epsilon}(t), where M(t) is continuous away from the origin and \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} R^{\epsilon}(t)=0. Indeed, in place of \frac{\mu((t-\epsilon, t+\epsilon))}{\epsilon} we may consider

\int \int \sigma_t^{\epsilon}(x-y) d\mu(x) d\mu(y), where \sigma_t is the Lebesgue measure on t\partial B and \sigma^{epsilon} is \sigma_t convolved with the approximation to the identity at level \epsilon, i.e \sigma_t^{\epsilon}(x)=\sigma_t* \rho(\cdot /\epsilon) \epsilon^{-d}(x).

By Plancherel, this expression equals

\int {|\widehat{\mu}(\xi)|}^2 \widehat{\sigma}(t\xi) \widehat{\rho}(\epsilon \xi) d\xi

=\int {|\widehat{\mu}(\xi)|}^2 \widehat{\sigma}(t\xi) d\xi+\int {|\widehat{\mu}(\xi)|}^2 \widehat{\sigma}(t\xi) (1-\widehat{\rho}(\epsilon \xi) d\xi

M(t)+R^{\epsilon}(t).

The function M(t) is continuous away fro t=0 by the dominated convergence theorem since

|\widehat{\sigma}(t \xi)| \lesssim {|t\xi|}^{-\frac{d-1}{2}} by the method of stationary phase and

\int {|\widehat{\mu}(\xi)|}^2 {|\xi|}^{-\frac{d-1}{2}} d\xi<\infty since \mu is a Frostman measure on E of Hausdorff dimension greater than \frac{d+1}{2}.

It remains to show that \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} R^{\epsilon}(t)=0. But

|R^{\epsilon}(t)| \lessapprox \int_{|\xi|>\epsilon^{-1}} {|\widehat{\mu}(\xi)|}^2 {|\xi|}^{-\frac{d-1}{2}} d\xi

\lesssim \sum_{2^j>\epsilon^{-1}} 2^{-j \frac{d-1}{2}} \int_{|\xi| \approx 2^j} {|\widehat{\mu}(\xi)|}^2 d\xi

\lesssim \sum_{2^j>\epsilon^{-1}} 2^{j(d-s-\frac{d-1}{2})}

\sum_{2^j>\epsilon^{-1}} 2^{j(\frac{d+1}{2}-s)} \lesssim \epsilon^{s-\frac{d+1}{2}} and this quantity goes to 0 as \epsilon \to 0 if s>\frac{d+1}{2}.

This argument shows that {|| \cdot ||}_B can be replaced by a much more general function.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s